Is it true a Pope once had his dead predecessor dug up for trial

Did a Pope really drag his dead predecessor from his grave to stand trial? Unearth the shocking truth behind one of history's most macabre and unbelievable papal sagas.

UsefulBS
UsefulBS
May 10, 20255 min read
Is it true a Pope once had his dead predecessor dug up for trial?
TLDR

Too Long; Didn't Read

TLDR: Yes, Pope Stephen VI had his dead predecessor Formosus dug up and put on trial.

The Cadaver Synod: Yes, a Pope Really Did Dig Up His Predecessor for Trial

History is peppered with moments so strange they defy easy belief. Imagine a courtroom scene, not with a living defendant, but with a decaying corpse, propped up on a throne, dressed in sacred vestments, to face accusations. This isn't a flight of macabre fiction; it's a documented event from the annals of the Papacy. Is it true a Pope once had his dead predecessor dug up for trial? The answer, astonishingly, is yes. This blog post delves into the chilling historical episode known as the Cadaver Synod, exploring its bizarre reality, the political turmoil that fueled it, and its lasting impact.

Unearthing a Grotesque Chapter: What Was the Cadaver Synod?

The "Cadaver Synod," or Synodus Horrenda in Latin, was an ecclesiastical trial held in Rome in January 897 AD. The defendant was Pope Formosus, who had been dead for about nine months. The presiding judge was his successor, Pope Stephen VI. Formosus's corpse was exhumed, dressed in papal robes, and seated on a throne in the Basilica of St. John Lateran to face a series of charges. This event stands as one of the most bizarre and scandalous episodes in the history of the Catholic Church.

The Turbulent Backdrop: Papal Politics in the Late 9th Century

To understand how such a grotesque event could occur, one must look at the chaotic political landscape of late 9th-century Italy. The Carolingian Empire was fragmenting, and various factions vied for control of the Italian peninsula and, by extension, influence over the papacy.

  • Power Struggles: Roman aristocratic families, along with powerful figures like the Dukes of Spoleto and the Emperors of the Holy Roman Empire, were locked in intense rivalries. The papacy was a significant prize, and popes were often made and unmade by these powerful secular rulers.
  • Short and Fraught Pontificates: This era saw a rapid succession of popes, many of whom met untimely ends, reflecting the instability and violence of the times.

The Key Players: Pope Formosus and Pope Stephen VI

Pope Formosus (Pontificate: 891-896 AD)

Formosus had a controversial career even before becoming Pope. He had been excommunicated by Pope John VIII, an excommunication later lifted. As Pope, he navigated complex political alliances. Crucially, he crowned Arnulf of Carinthia as Holy Roman Emperor, an act that angered the powerful Spoleto family, who supported their own candidate, Lambert of Spoleto. Formosus's death in April 896 did not end the animosity his actions had generated.

Pope Stephen VI (Pontificate: 896-897 AD)

Stephen VI was a Roman, likely installed with the backing of the Spoletan faction, which held significant sway in Rome following Arnulf's departure due to illness and Formosus's death. It is widely believed that Stephen VI orchestrated the Cadaver Synod under pressure from, or in alignment with, Lambert of Spoleto and his mother, Ageltrude, who sought to delegitimize Formosus and his imperial appointments.

The Macabre Trial: A Spectacle of Vengeance

The details of the Cadaver Synod are grim and almost unbelievable:

  1. Exhumation: Formosus's nine-month-old corpse was dug up from its grave.
  2. The "Defendant": The decaying body was clad in papal vestments and propped up on a throne.
  3. The Charges: A deacon was appointed to "speak" for the deceased Pope. Formosus was accused of perjury, of having acceded to the papacy illegally (having been Bishop of Porto, canon law at the time, though often ignored, forbade the translation of bishops from one see to another, especially to Rome), and of ruling uncanonically.
  4. The Verdict and Punishment: Unsurprisingly, Formosus was found guilty. His papal acts and ordinations were declared null and void. The papal vestments were stripped from his body, the three fingers of his right hand used for blessings were hacked off, and his corpse was initially buried in a common grave. Later, it was dug up again and thrown into the Tiber River.

The Aftermath and Grim Legacy

The Cadaver Synod was met with revulsion by the Roman populace. The grotesque spectacle backfired on Stephen VI.

  • Public Outrage: A subsequent earthquake was interpreted by many as a sign of divine displeasure. Public opinion turned violently against Stephen VI.
  • Stephen VI's Downfall: Later in 897 AD, he was overthrown, imprisoned, and eventually strangled.
  • Reversals and Condemnations: Subsequent popes, like Theodore II and John IX, annulled the decrees of the Cadaver Synod, rehabilitated Formosus, and had his body recovered from the Tiber and reburied with honor. Pope Sergius III, however, a strong supporter of Stephen VI, later reaffirmed the condemnations of Formosus in 904 AD, leading to further instability and confusion regarding the validity of ordinations performed by Formosus.

The Cadaver Synod serves as a stark reminder of the depths to which the papacy could sink during periods of intense political manipulation and factionalism. It highlights a time when spiritual authority was profoundly compromised by temporal power struggles.

Conclusion: A Disturbing Truth in Papal History

So, is it true a Pope once had his dead predecessor dug up for trial? Yes, the Cadaver Synod of 897 AD is a factual, albeit deeply unsettling, historical event. It underscores a turbulent period where the papal office was enmeshed in bitter political rivalries and personal vendettas. While an extreme example, the Cadaver Synod reveals the human frailties and political machinations that could affect even one of the world's oldest institutions. It remains a bizarre, cautionary tale from the annals of history, reminding us that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

Was this helpful?

Share this article

More Articles